Dental Journal of Advance Studies

Register      Login

VOLUME 2 , ISSUE 3 ( September-December, 2014 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Mixed Dentition Analysis: A Revised Equation for New Generation

Varun Dua, Avninder Kaur, Manjeet Kaur

Keywords : Tanaka and Johnston, mixed dentition analysis, tooth sizes, mesiodistal dimensions, prediction equation

Citation Information : Dua V, Kaur A, Kaur M. Mixed Dentition Analysis: A Revised Equation for New Generation. 2014; 2 (3):150-156.

DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1672002

License: NA

Published Online: 12-05-2023

Copyright Statement:  NA


Abstract

Abstract: Aim: Racial difference is an important factor in tooth size variability. The present study was thus aimed to assess the applicability of Tanaka and Johnston method for predicting the mesiodistal dimensions of canine and premolars in children of Panchkula, Haryana. Methods: Dental study models of 200 children were analysed to check the applicability of Tanaka and Johnston method of mixed dentition analysis. Results: Differences have been found in the means of actual dimensions of canine & premolars and values derived by regression equation of Tanaka and Johnston by Student's t-test and therefore formulated a new equation. Conclusion: Tooth size differences amongst races are an important variable that must be considered before the formulation of prediction equation. The proposed new prediction equations derived in the present study are possibly more appropriate to be used for mixed dentition analysis in a population of Panchkula, Haryana.


PDF Share
  1. Ngan PW, Wei SH, Yen PK. Orthodontic treatment in the primary dentition. J Am Dent Assoc 1988; 116: 336-340.
  2. Irwind RD, Herold JS, Richardson A. Mixed dentition analysis: A review of methods and their accuracy. Int J Paed Dent 1995; 5: 137-142.
  3. Nance HN. The limitation of orthodontic treatment. Mixed dentition diagnosis and treatment. Am J Orthod 1947; 33: 177-223.
  4. Foster RR, Wylie WL. Arch length deficiency in the mixed dentition. Am J Orthod 1958; 44: 464-476.
  5. Cohen MI. Recognition of the developing Malocclusion. Dent Clin North Am 1959; 6: 299-311.
  6. Ballard ML, Wylie WL. Mixed dentition case analysis: estimating sizes of unerupted permanent. Am J Orthod 1947; 33:754-759.
  7. Tanaka MM, Johnston LE. The prediction of the sizes of unerupted canines and premolars in a contemporary orthodontic population. J Am Dent Assoc 1974; 88: 798-801.
  8. Carey CW. Linear arch dimension and tooth size. Am J Orthod 1949; 35: 762-767.
  9. Motokawa W, Masao O, Yoshio S, Yutaka Y. A method of mixed dentition analysis in mandible. J Dent Child 1987; 54(2): 114-8.
  10. Gianelly AA. Boston university mixed dentition space analysis (1996). As cited by Bishara and Jacobsen in comparison of two non-radiographic methods for predicting tooth size in the mixed dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1998; 113: 574.
  11. Gardner RB. A comparison of four methods of predicting arch length. Am J Orthod 1979; 75: 387-397.
  12. Kaplan RG, Smith CC, Kanarek PH. A comparison of three mixed dentition analyses. J Dent Res 1978; 56(11): 1337-1343.
  13. Priya S, Munshi AK. Formulation of prediction charts for mixed dentition analysis. J Indian Soc Pedo Prev Dent 1994; 12: 7-11.
  14. Garn SM, Lewis AB, Swinder DR, Kerewsky RS. Genetic control of sexual dimorphism in tooth size. J Dent Res 1967; 46(suppl): 963-972.
  15. Al-Khadra BH. Prediction of the sizes of unerupted canines and premolars in a Saudi Arab population. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1993; 104: 369-372.
  16. Lee-Chan S, Jacobson BN, Chwa KH, Jacobson RS. Mixed dentition analysis for Asian American. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1998; 113: 293-299.
  17. Schirmer UR, Wiltshire WA. Orthodontic probability tables for black patients of African descent: Mixed dentition analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1997; 112:545-551.
  18. Jaroontham J, Godfrey K. Mixed dentition space analysis in Thai population. Euro J Orthod 2000; 22: 127-34.
  19. Richardson ER, Malhotra SK. Mesiodistal crown dimensions of the permanent dentition of American Negroes. Am J Orthod 1975; 68: 157-164.
  20. Lavelle CLB. Secular trends in different racial groups. Angle Orthod 1972; 42(1): 19-25.
  21. Otuyemi OD, Noar JH. A comparison of the permanent teeth in a Nigerian and British population. Eur J Orthod 1996; 18: 623-628.
  22. Singh M, Nanda RS. Prediction of tooth size and its clinical application. J Ind Dent Assoc 1972; 44:95-98.
  23. Diagne F, Diop-Ba K, Ngom PI, Mbow K. Mixed dentition analysis in a Senegalese population: Elaboration of prediction tables. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2003; 124: 178-183.
  24. Garn SM. Genetics of dental development. As cited by McDonald and Avery in “Growth of face and dental arches”. Dentistry for the child and the Adoloscent. 8th ed. St, Louis: Mosby; 2004. pp 593.
  25. Potter Rh et al. A twin study on dental dimension- Independent genetic determinants. As cited by McDonald and Avery in “Growth of face and dental arches”. Dentistry for the child and the Adoloscent. 8th ed. St, Louis: Mosby; 2004. pp 593.
  26. Alhaija ESJ, Qudeimat MA. Mixed dentition space analysis in a Jordanian population: comparison of two methods. Int J Paed Dent 2006;16:104–110.
  27. Moorrees CFA, Reed RB. Correlations among crown diameters of human teeth. Arch Oral Biol 1964; 9: 685-697.
  28. Hixon EH, Oldfather RE. Estimation of the sizes of unerupted cuspids and bicuspids. Angle Orthod 1958; 28: 236-240.
  29. Black GV. Descriptive Anatomy of Human Teeth. 4th ed. SS White: Philadelphia; 1986.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.