Dental Journal of Advance Studies

Register      Login

VOLUME 5 , ISSUE 1 ( January-April, 2017 ) > List of Articles

REVIEW ARTICLE

Current Concepts and Trends in Biomechanics and Biomaterials of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Neha Jindal, Manjit Kumar, Ramandeep

Keywords : Dental Implant, Implantology, Recent Advances, Future Trends

Citation Information : Jindal N, Kumar M, Ramandeep. Current Concepts and Trends in Biomechanics and Biomaterials of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. 2017; 5 (1):14-24.

DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1672076

License: NA

Published Online: 20-05-2017

Copyright Statement:  NA


Abstract

The science of Implantology has undergone numerous modifications and improvement and is highly dynamic. With each improvement and advancement, Implantology has proved to be a boon in disguise to the society and hence its acceptance by the general population has widely increased despite of expensive treatment modality. More of clinical trials conducted on different commercially available implants, its effect on bone and oral tissues as well as the development of implant designs, have increased the success rate of implants to over 95% and specially in anterior mandible where the success rate is over 99%. Latest technological advances in Dental Implantology are reviewed in this article.


PDF Share
  1. Pye AD, Lockhart DE, Dawson MP, Murray CA, Smith AJ. A review of dental implants and infection. J Hosp Infect 2009;72:104-10.
  2. Christenson EM, Anseth KS, Van Den Beucken JJ, Chan CK, Ercan B, Jansen JA. Nano biomaterial applications in orthopedics. J Orthop Res 2007;25:11-22.
  3. Branemark PI, Svensson B, Van Steenberghe D. Ten year survival rates of fixed prostheses on four or six implants ad modum Branemark in full edentulism. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995;6:227-31.
  4. Brunette DM. Mechanical, Thermal, chemical and electrochemical surface treatment of titanium, in titanium in medicine. In: Brunette DM, Tengvall P, Textor M, Thomson editors.: Springer-Verlang, Berlin Heidelberg; 2001. P. 231- 66.
  5. Bagno A, Di Bello C. Surface treatments and roughness properties of Ti-based biomaterials. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2004;15:935-49.
  6. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: Part 1 - Review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:536-43.
  7. Abrahamsson I, Zitzmann NU, Berglundh T, Wennerberg A, Lindhe J. Bone and soft-tissue integration to titanium implants with different surface topography: An experimental study in the dog. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:323-32.
  8. London RM, Roberts FA, Baker DA, Rohrer MD, O'Neal RB. Histologic comparison of a thermal dual-etched implant surface to machined, TPS, and HA surfaces: Bone contact in vivo in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:369- 76.
  9. Park JY, Davies JE. Red blood cell and platelet interactions with titanium implant surfaces. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:530-9.
  10. Orsini G, Assenza B, Scarano A, Piattelli M, Piattelli A. Surface analysis of machined versus sandblasted and acidetched titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:779-84.
  11. Gotfredsen K, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Anchorage of titanium implants with different surface characteristics: An experimental study in rabbits. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000;2:120-8.
  12. Josse S, Faucheux C, Soueidan A, Grimandi G, Massiot D, Alonso B. Novel biomaterials for bisphosphonate delivery. Biomaterials 2005;26:2073-80.
  13. Meng JC, Everts JE, Qian F, Gratton DG. Influence of connection geometry on dynamic micromotion at the implant abutment interface. Int J Prosthodont 2007;20:623-5.
  14. Niznick G. The implant abutment connection: The key to prosthetic success. Compendium 1991;12:932-8.
  15. Muley N, Prithviraj DR, Gupta V. Evolution of External and Internal Implant to Abutment Connection. Int J Oral Implantol Clin Res 2012; 3:122-9.
  16. Lazzara RJ, Porter SS. Platform switching: A new concept in implant dentistry for controlling post restorative crestal bone levels. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006; 26:9-17.
  17. Piconi C, Maccauro G. Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial. Journal of Biomaterials 1999;20:1-25
  18. Cochran DL, Morton D, Weber HP. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding loading protocols for endosseous dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19 suppl 1:109-13.
  19. Nkenke E, Fenner M. Indications for immediate loading of implants and implant success. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;2:19-34.
  20. Siessegger M, Schneider BT, Mischkowski RA, Lazar F, Krug B, Klesper B. Use of an image-guided navigation system in dental implant surgery in anatomically complex operation sites. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2001;29:276-81.
  21. Tu CY, Lin LD, Wang TM, Hsu YC, Lee MS. Using mini dental implants to improve the stability of an existing mandibular complete denture in a patient with severe ridge resorption. J Prosthodont Implantol 2012;1:48-52.
  22. Bencharit S, Byrd WC, Altarawneh S, Hosseini B, Leong A, Reside G. Development and applications of porous tantalum trabecular metal-enhanced titanium dental implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2014;16:817-26.
  23. Kuabara MR, Ferreira EJ, Gulinelli JL, Paz LG. Rehabilitation with zygomatic implants: A treatment option for the atrophic edentulous maxilla-9-year follow-up. Quintessence Int 2010;41:9-12.
  24. Kim SH, Kim KH, Seo BM, Koo KT, Kim TI, Seol YJ. Alveolar bone regeneration by transplantation of periodontal ligament stem cells and bone marrow stem cells in a canine peri-implant defect model: A pilot study. J Periodontol 2009;80:1815-23.
  25. Prasad DK, Shetty M, Bansal N, Hegde C. Crestal bone preservation: A review of different approach for successful therapy. Indian J Dent Res 2011;22:317-23.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.