Dental Journal of Advance Studies

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Volume  12 (2024)
Volume  11 (2023)
Volume  10 (2022)
Volume  9 (2021)
Volume  8 (2020)
Volume  7 (2019)
Volume  6 (2018)
Volume  5 (2017)
Volume  4 (2016)
Volume  3 (2015)
Volume  2 (2014)
Volume  1 (2013)
Related articles

VOLUME 6 , ISSUE 2--3 ( September-December, 2018 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Evaluation in Arch Width Variations among Different Skeletal Patterns in District Solan Population

Isha Aggarwal, Sumit Chhatwalia, Sanjay Mittal, Mandeep K. Bhullar, Divya Singla

Keywords : normodivergent, hypodivergent, hyperdivergent, interpremolar arch widths, intermolar arch widths

Citation Information : Aggarwal I, Chhatwalia S, Mittal S, Bhullar MK, Singla D. Evaluation in Arch Width Variations among Different Skeletal Patterns in District Solan Population. 2018; 6 (2--3):112-117.

DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1677890

License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Published Online: 29-01-2019

Copyright Statement:  © 2018 Bhojia Dental College and Hospital affiliated to Himachal Pardesh University


Abstract

Introduction The facial growth pattern differs from individual to individual, and the variations in it are quite high. The assessment of relationship of dental arch dimensions with the facial growth pattern is essential for proper diagnosis and treatment planning. Aim The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the dental and alveolar arch widths in patients with varying facial growth patterns in Distt. Solan population. Materials and Methods Pretreatment lateral cephalograms and dental study models of 45 patients with age group between 16 and 30 years were included in the study. Patients were divided into three groups: group I (normodivergent), group II (hypodivergent), and group III (hyperdivergent) on the basis of y-axis, Jarabak ratio, and SN-MP (Sella-Nasion–mandibular plane) angle. Interpremolar and intermolar dental and alveolar arch widths were measured and compared for all the three groups. Results The results showed that the dental and alveolar arch widths were increased in hypodivergent patients and decreased in hyperdivergent patients, which was not statistically significant. Conclusion It was concluded that the dental and alveolar arch dimensions increased as the facial pattern became horizontal.

PDF Share
  1. Comparison of dental and alveolar arch widths in class I and class II division 1 malocclusion. Pak Oral Dent J 2013;33(2):289–294
  2. Comparison of arch forms between Egyptian and North American white populations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;139(3):e245–e252
  3. Arch width and form: a review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;115(3): 305–313
  4. Arch form and dimensional changes in orthodontics. Prog Orthod 2008;9(2): 66–73
  5. Orthodontic Diagnosis and Planning. Denver, CO: Rocky Mountain Data Systems; 1982
  6. Vertical growth versus anteroposterior growth as related to function and treatment. Angle Orthod 1964;34(2): 75–93
  7. The short face syndrome. Am J Orthod 1978;73(5): 499–511
  8. Relationship between dental arch dimensions and vertical facial morphology in class I subjects. J Indian Orthod Soc 2012;46(6): 316–324
  9. Arch width in the premolar region-still the major problem in orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthopedics 1957;43(1): 5–31
  10. Extreme variation in vertical facial growth and associated variation in skeletal and dental relations. Angle Orthod 1971;41(3): 219–229
  11. Orthodontic extractions and the facial skeletal pattern. Angle Orthod 1972;42(2): 116–122
  12. An investigation of mandibular morphology in subjects with different vertical facial growth patterns. Aust Orthod J 2000;16(1): 16–22
  13. Facial type measurements influence on transverse dimensions of normal occlusion arches. J Health Sci Inst. 2013;31(3): 20–23
  14. Sexual dimorphism in normal craniofacial growth. Angle Orthod 1993;63(1): 47–56
  15. Dental and alveolar arch widths in normal occlusion, class II division 1 and class II division 2. Angle Orthod 2005;75(6): 941–947
  16. Clinical applicability of variations in arch dimensions and arch forms among various vertical facial patterns. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2011;21(11): 685–690
  17. Essentials of Facial Growth. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1996
  18. Longitudinal changes in three normal facial types. Am J Orthod 1985;88(6): 466–502
  19. Evaluation of transverse changes in the dental arches according to growth pattern: a longitudinal study. Dental Press J Orthod 2012;17(1): 66–73
  20. Relationship between vertical facial patterns and dental arch form in class II malocclusion. Prog Orthod 2013;14:43
  21. Correlation between dental arch width and sagittal dento-skeletal morphology in untreated adults. J Dent (Tehran) 2013;10(6): 522–531
  22. Evaluation of arch width variations among different skeletal patterns in South Indian population. J Nat Sci Biol Med 2013;4(1): 94–102
  23. . R, Fabricky M, Jiv.nescu A, Bratu DC. Alveolar and dental arch morphology in Angle class II division 2 malocclusion: a comparative study. Rom J Morphol Embryol 2014;55(3, Suppl): 1093–1097
  24. Correlation between arch form and facial for a cross sectional study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2015;7(Suppl 1):S85.S86
  25. Evaluation of facial morphology and sagittal relationship between dental arches in primary and mixed dentition. Dental Press J Orthod 2015;20(4): 63–67
  26. Quantitative evaluation of masseter muscle volume in different growth patterns and its correlation with facial morphology: Cone beam computed tomography study. J Indian Orthod Soc 2016;50:106–110
  27. Correlation of facial profile and dental arches in a population of Yucatan. Rev Mex Ortodon 2016;4(2):e81–e84
  28. A comparative study to access cephalometric and arch width characteristics of class II division 1 and division 2 malocclusions among Indian and Turkish population. J Dent Sci 2017;2(3):000133
  29. Comparative study of MDCT with plaster cast model of dentoalveolar arch morphology. Int J Anat Rad Surg 2017;6(2):RO17–RO20
  30. Cant of the occlusal plane and axial inclinations of the teeth. Angle Orthod 1971;41:219–229
  31. The long face syndrome: vertical maxillary excess. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 70(4):398–408
  32. Buccolingual inclinations of posterior teeth in subjects with different facial patterns. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;125(3):316–322
  33. Relationship between facial types and tooth and bone characteristics of the mandible obtained by CT scanning. Angle Orthod 1998;68(6):557–562
  34. Relationships between masticatory muscle cross-section and skull shape. J Dent Res 1984;63(9):1154–1157
  35. Comparative data on facial morphology and muscle thickness using ultrasonography. Eur J Orthod 2005;27(6):562–567
  36. Isometric bite force and its relation to dimensions of the facial skeleton. Acta Odontol Scand 1973;31(1):35–42
  37. Masticatory muscle force and facial morphology in man. Arch Oral Biol 1978;23(3):203–206
  38. Relationships between the size and spatial morphology of human masseter and medial pterygoid muscles, the craniofacial skeleton, and jaw biomechanics. Am J Phys Anthropol 1989;80(4):429–445
  39. Masseter muscle thickness measured by ultrasonography and its relation to facial morphology. J Dent Res 1991;70(9):1262–1265
  40. Relationships between jaw muscle cross-sections and normal craniofacial morphology, studied with magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Orthod 1991;13:351–361
  41. Ultrasound image of human masseter muscle related to bite force, electromyography, facial morphology, and occlusal factors. Scand J Dent Res 1992;100(3):164–171
  42. Masticatory muscle influence on craniofacial growth. Acta Odontol Scand 1995;53(3):196–202
  43. Relationship between dental arch width and vertical facial morphology in untreated adults. Eur J Orthod 2008;30(3):288–294
  44. A comparison of jaw muscle cross-sections of longface and normal adults. J Dent Res 1992;71(6):1279–1285
  45. Correlations between the cross-sectional area of the jaw muscles and craniofacial size and shape. Am J Phys Anthropol 1986;70(4):423–431
  46. Masseter muscle volume measured using ultrasonography and its relationship with facial morphology. Eur J Orthod 1999;21(6):659–670
  47. The mandibular dental arch: part III. Buccal expansion. Angle Orthod 1978;48(4):303–310
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.