Dental Journal of Advance Studies

Register      Login

VOLUME 7 , ISSUE 1 ( January-April, 2019 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Relationship between Third Molar Agenesis and Other Dental Anomalies

Stuti Gulati, Divya Singla, Sanjay Mittal, Mandeep Bhullar, Isha Aggarwal, Abhishek Sharma

Keywords : agenesis, dental anomalies, third molars

Citation Information : Gulati S, Singla D, Mittal S, Bhullar M, Aggarwal I, Sharma A. Relationship between Third Molar Agenesis and Other Dental Anomalies. 2019; 7 (1):23-27.

DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1685127

License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Published Online: 03-04-2019

Copyright Statement:  © 2019 Bhojia Dental College and Hospital affiliated to Himachal Pradesh University


Objective The purpose of this study was to find the prevalence of dental abnormalities in patients with third molar agenesis, and a comparison was made for the prevalence of those anomalies within the north Indian natives. Materials and Methods Pretreatment records of 518 patients were collected. Out of 518 patients whose records were analyzed, 472 patient records were selected on the basis of inclusion and exclusion standards. Panoramic radiographs and dental casts were analyzed in patients who had an absence of at least one third molar in which absence of any other tooth, presence of supernumerary teeth, presence of impacted canines, and peg-shaped lateral incisors were further assessed. The prevalence of these anomalies was compared with a randomly selected group of patients with presence of third molars that served as controls. Statistical analysis was done using the chi-square test (p < 0.05) and odds ratio. Results The incidence of third molar nondevelopment was found to be 19.2%. The presence of other anomalies was 39.5% in patients with third molar nondevelopment, and difference was statistically significant. The occurrence of impacted canines in patients with absence of third molars was 22%, and presence of third molars was 6.6%. The presence of other dental anomalies, that is, supernumerary teeth and tooth agenesis, was 7.7% in the agenesis group, which was also higher than that in the control group (3.3%) but was not statistically significant. The incidence of peg-shaped lateral incisors was similar in both the groups. Conclusion Impacted canines and total dental anomalies are more often related with absence of third molars than with the presence of third molars.

PDF Share
  1. Almpani K, Kolokitha OE. Role of third molars in orthodontics. World J Clin Cases 2015;3(2):132–140
  2. Glesier J, Hunt EE. The permanent mandibular first molar: its calcification eruption and decay. Am J Phys Anthrop. 1955;253–283
  3. Richardson M. Late third molar genesis: its significance in orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 1980;50(2):121–128
  4. Vastardis H. The genetics of human tooth agenesis: new discoveries for understanding dental anomalies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;117(6):650–656
  5. Garib DG, Peck S, Gomes SC. Increased occurrence of dental anomalies associated with second-premolar agenesis. Angle Orthod 2009;79(3):436–441
  6. Nuvvula S, Kiranmayi M, Shilpa G, Nirmala SV. Hypohyperdontia: Agenesis of three third molars and mandibular centrals associated with midline supernumerary tooth in mandible. Contemp Clin Dent 2010;1(3):136–141
  7. Levesque GY, Demirijian A, Tanguay R. Sexual dimorphism in the development, emergence, and agenesis of the mandibular third molar. J Dent Res 1981;60(10):1735–1741
  8. Kruger E, Thomson WM, Konthasinghe P. Third molar outcomes from age 18 to 26: findings from a population-based New Zealand longitudinal study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001;92(2):150–155
  9. Lavelle BLC, Ashton EH Flinn MR. Cusp Pattern, Tooth size and third molar agenesis in the human mandibular dentition. Archs Oral Biol. 1970;(15):227–237
  10. Garn SM, Lewis AB. The relationship between third molar agenesis and reduction in tooth number. Angle Orthod 1960;32:14–18
  11. Celikoglu M, Bayram M, Nur M. Patterns of third-molar agenesis and associated dental anomalies in an orthodontic population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;140(6):856–860
  12. Massler M, Schour I, Poncher HG. Developmental pattern of the child as reflected in the calcification pattern of the teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1941;62:33–67
  13. Kajii T, Imai T, Kajii S, Iida J. Presence of third molar germs in orthodontic patients in Japan. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;119(3):245–250
  14. Sisman Y, Uysal T, Gelgor IE. Hypodontia. Does the prevalence and distribution pattern differ in orthodontic patients? Eur J Dent 2007;1(3):167–173
  15. Shah RM, Boyd MA. The relationship between presence and absence of third molars hypodontia of other teeth. J Dent Res 1979;58(1):544
  16. Peck S, Peck L, Kataja M. Prevalence of tooth agenesis and peg-shaped maxillary lateral incisor associated with palatally displaced canine (PDC) anomaly. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;110(4):441–443
  17. Baccetti T. A controlled study of associated dental anomalies. Angle Orthod 1998;68(3):267–274
  18. Altug-Atac AT, Erdem D. Prevalence and distribution of dental anomalies in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131(4):510–514
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.