Dental Journal of Advance Studies

Register      Login

VOLUME 8 , ISSUE 3 ( September-December, 2020 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

To Establish Cephalometric Floating Norms as a Guide toward Harmonious Cranial Individual Pattern among North Indian Adults

Sanjay Mittal, Mandeep Bhullar, Isha Aggarwal, Tanzin Palkit, Sumit Chhatwalia

Keywords : floating norms, harmony box, skeletal pattern

Citation Information : Mittal S, Bhullar M, Aggarwal I, Palkit T, Chhatwalia S. To Establish Cephalometric Floating Norms as a Guide toward Harmonious Cranial Individual Pattern among North Indian Adults. 2020; 8 (3):102-108.

DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1714322

License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Published Online: 06-12-2020

Copyright Statement:  © 2020 Bhojia Dental College and Hospital affiliated to Himachal Pradesh University


Abstract

Introduction Floating norms put us at ease while diagnosing and establishing a treatment plan for an individual with abnormal skeletal pattern. It uses the variability of the associations among appropriate cephalometric variables and later on the basis of a regression model by combination of both skeletal parameters which are sagittal and vertical and construct a harmony box which make diagnosis straightforward. This study aims to establish floating cephalometric norms for the describing individual craniofacial skeletal pattern among North Indian Adults as an additional diagnostic tool for orthodontic treatment planning. Materials and Methods The study includes North Indian adults in age range of 17 to 25 years. A total of 30 patients were selected and were subjected to cephalometric evaluation. Various angular measurements viz., SNB (sella-nasion-point B), NL-NSL (maxillary line-nasion sella line), ML-NSL (mandibular line-nasion sella line), N–S–Ba (nasion-sella-basion), SNA (sella-nasion-point A), and ML-NL (mandibular line-maxillary line) were considered for designing harmony box for North Indian adults. Results The results of the study were subjected to various statistical analyses. SNB served as the independent variable and NL-NSL, NSBa, ML-NSL, ML-NL, and SNA were made the dependent variable due to lesser R2 values in multiple regression analysis. Correlation between some of the variables, such as (SNA–SNB, ML-NSL–NL-NSL, and ML-NSL–ML-NL), in the present North Indian sample showed positive correlation among each other and were statistically significant (p = 0.000). When compared with the other similar studies done previously, least variability was seen with the Segner study and maximum variability was seen with Thilander's study. Conclusion The analysis of the individual craniofacial pattern by means of floating norms appears to provide a helpful method in determining the parameters responsible for the skeletal disharmony, thus representing a viable option for additional diagnostic tool in orthodontic and orthopaedic/surgical treatment planning.


PDF Share
  1. A new x-ray technique and its application to orthodontia. Angle Orthod 1931;1:45–66
  2. Die bedeutung der röntgenfern-und abstandsaufnahme für die diagnostik der kieferanomalien. Fortschritte der Orthodontik in Theorie und Praxis. 1931;1:231–258
  3. A comparison of outcomes of orthodontic and surgical-orthodontic treatment of Class II malocclusion in adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;101(6):556–565
  4. An assessment of treatment outcome in American Board of Orthodontics cases. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;111(3):335–342
  5. Cephalometric norms in Japanese adults. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998;56(2): 129–134
  6. London, United Kingdom: Mos By-wolfe; 1997
  7. The pattern of craniofacial associations: a morphological and methodological correlation and factor analysis study on young male adults. Acta Odontol Scand 1967. Doi 10.1016/0002-9416(67)90010-3
  8. Cephalometric floating norms as a guide toward a harmonious individual craniofacial pattern among Filipinos. Angle Orthod 2009;79(6):1162–1168
  9. Facial soft tissue harmony and growth in orthodontic treatment. Semin Orthod 1995;1(2):67–81
  10. The quadrilateral analysis: an individualized skeletal assessment. Am J Orthod 1983;83(1):19–32
  11. Cephalometrics in clinical practice. Angle Orthod 1959;29:8–29
  12. The Frankfort-mandibular incisor angle (FMIA) in orthodontic diagnosis, treatment planning and prognosis. Angle Orthod 1954;24:121–169
  13. Floating norms as guidance for the position of the lower incisors. Angle Orthod 1980;50(3):165–168
  14. An analysis of the variation of the ANB angle: a statistical appraisal. Am J Orthod 1985;87(2):144–146
  15. Floating norms as a means to describe individual skeletal patterns. Eur J Orthod 1989;11(3):214–220
  16. 3 rd ed. Hamburg, Germany: Segner verlag & vertreb; 1998
  17. Cephalometric floating norms for North American adults. Angle Orthod 1998;68(6):497–502
  18. Vergleich der dento-kraniofazialen Morphologie zweier ethnischer Gruppen mit eugnathem Gebiss im Fernröntgenseitenbild (Doctoral dissertation) lmu; 2002
  19. Kraniofaziale Strukturen syrischer und deutscher Probanden (Doctoral dissertation) lmu; 2005
  20. Floating norms for the assessment of craniofacial pattern in the deciduous dentition. Eur J Orthod 1996;18(4):359–365
  21. Analysis and classification of the rotational growth pattern without implants. Br J Orthod 1982;9(1):51–56
  22. Kimberly Dr.: Quintessence Publishing Co; 1995
  23. In: Lundstrom A Nordisk larbok i odontologisk ortopedi. Stockholm; 1958
  24. Roentgencephalometric standards for the facial skeleton and soft tissue profile of Swedish children and young adults. II. Comparisons with earlier Scandinavian normative data. Swed Dent J Suppl 1982;15:219–228
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.