Esthetics has been an ever-evolving concept and has gained considerable importance in the field of orthodontics in the last few decades. The re-emergence of the soft tissue paradigm has further catapulted the interest of the orthodontist. So much so that achieving a harmonious profile and an esthetically pleasing smile has become the ideal goal of treatment and is no longer secondary to achieving a functional dental occlusion and/or a rigid adherence to skeletal and dental norms. Esthetics in the orthodontic sense can be divided into three categories: macroesthetics, miniesthetics, and microesthetics. Macroesthetics includes the evaluation of the face and involves frontal assessment and profile analysis. The frontal assessment involves assessment of facial proportions, while the profile analysis involves evaluation of anterior–posterior position of jaws, mandibular plane, and incisor prominence and lip posture. Miniesthetics involves study of the smile framework involving the vertical tooth–lip relationship, smile type, transverse dimensions of smile, smile arc, and midline. Microesthetics involves the assessment of tooth proportions, height-width relationships, connectors and embrasures, gingival contours and heights, and tooth shade and color. The harmony between these factors enables an orthodontist to achieve the idealized esthetic result and hence these parameters deserve due consideration. The importance placed on a pleasing profile cannot be undermined and the orthodontist should aim for a harmonious facial profile over rigid adherence to standard average cephalometric norms. This article aims to give an overview of the macro, mini, and microesthetic considerations in relation to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning.
Evolution of esthetic considerations in orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015;148(3):374–379
Orthodontics about face: the re-emergence of the esthetic paradigm. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;117(5):575–576
Background considerations to facial aesthetics. J Orthod 2001;28(2):159–168
Cross- vs. within-racial judgments of attractiveness. Percept Psychophys 1982;32(6): 495–503
Cross-cultural comparisons in interpersonal attraction of females toward males. J Soc Psychol 1979;108(1):121–122
Cross-cultural perceptions of physical attractiveness: Ratings of photographs of whites by Cruzans and Americans. Percept Mot Skills 1985;60(1):163–166
Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychol Bull 2000;126(3):390–423
A concept of facial esthetics. Angle Orthod 1970;40(4):284–318
Selected aspects of the art and science of facial esthetics. Semin Orthod 1995;1(2):105–126
Perceptions of a balanced facial profile. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993; 104(2):180–187
5th edition. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier, Mosby; 2012
In: Ricketts RM. ed. Provocations and Perceptions in Craniofacial Orthopedics, Vol 1. Boulder, CO: RMO; 1989: 149–202
The biologic significance of the divine proportion and Fibonacci series. Am J Orthod 1982;81(5):351–370
More than lip service: facial esthetics in orthodontics. J Am Dent Assoc 1999;130(8):1173–1181
Lip posture and its significance in treatment planning. Am J Orthod 1967;53(4):262–284
Soft tissue facial considerations and orthodontic treatment. Semin Orthod 2000;6(1):3–20
An esthetic evaluation of lip-teeth relationships present in the smile. Am J Orthod 1970;57(2):132–144
Some esthetic factors in a smile. J Prosthet Dent 1984;51(1):24–28
In Nanda R, ed. Biomechanics and Esthetic Strategies in Clinical Orthodontics. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Saunders; 2005: 110–130
Dynamic smile visualization and quantification: Part 2. Smile analysis and treatment strategies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124(2):116–127
The kinetics of anterior tooth display. J Prosthet Dent 1978;39(5):502–504
Dynamic smile analysis: changes with age. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136(3):310. e1–310.e10
The dynesthetic interpretation of the dentogenic concept. J Prosthet Dent 1958;8(4):558–581
Influence of orthodontic treatment, midline position, buccal corridor and smile arc on smile attractiveness. Angle Orthod 2011;81(1):153–161
Clinical effectiveness of orthodontic treatment on smile esthetics: a systematic review. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent 2019;11:89–101
Esthetics and anterior tooth position: an orthodontic perspective. Part II: Vertical position. J Esthet Dent 1993;5(4):174–178
The importance of incisor positioning in the esthetic smile: the smile arc. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;120(2):98–111
Comparing the perception of dentists and lay people to altered dental esthetics. J Esthet Dent 1999;11(6):311–324
Microaesthetics of the smile: extraction vs. non-extraction. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2012;22(4):230–234
Width/length ratios of normal clinical crowns of the maxillary anterior dentition in man. J Clin Periodontol 1999;26(3):153–157
Dental smile esthetics: the assessment and creation of the ideal smile. Semin Orthod 2012;18(3):193–201
Esthetics and anterior tooth position: an orthodontic perspective. Part I: crown length. J Esthet Dent 1993;5(1):19–23
Principles of cosmetic dentistry in orthodontics: Part 1. Shape and proportionality of anterior teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126(6):749–753
Macroesthetic elements of smile design. J Am Dent Assoc 2001;132(1):39–45
The Science and Art of Porcelain Laminate Veneers. London: Quintessence Publishing (IL); 2003
