Dental Journal of Advance Studies

Register      Login

VOLUME 9 , ISSUE 3 ( September-December, 2021 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Influence of Bone Quality on the Use of Implant Prostheses with Intermediate Pontic: Three-dimensional Finite Element Method

Marcelo Bighetti Toniollo, Andrea Sayuri Silveira Dias Terada, Jair Pereira de Melo Júnior, Cláudio Rodrigues Rezende Costa, Diogo Henrique Vaz de Souza

Keywords : fixed partial denture, finite element analysis, bone-implant interface

Citation Information : Toniollo MB, Terada AS, de Melo Júnior JP, Costa CR, de Souza DH. Influence of Bone Quality on the Use of Implant Prostheses with Intermediate Pontic: Three-dimensional Finite Element Method. 2021; 9 (3):151-156.

DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1739508

License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Published Online: 23-11-2021

Copyright Statement:  © 2021. Bhojia Dental College and Hospital affiliated to Himachal Pradesh University.


Abstract

Objective The present study aimed to observe the differences in the dissipation of the main minimum stresses with the use of a fixed pontic partial prosthesis supported by two regular length implants in cortical and medullary bone tissues of different qualities. Materials and Methods Experimental groups were as follows: QI (two regular length implants with fixed pontic partial prosthesis and bony qualities consistent with type I), QII (identical to QI, with bony qualities consistent with type II), and QIII (identical to QI, with bony qualities consistent with type III). All the groups were developed and analyzed in virtual simulation environment using AnsysWorkbench software. Results The results showed highest stress concentrations in the region of the turns of the implants, especially in the apical region surrounding the implants and most notably in those positioned in the posterior region, supporting the molars. In addition, comparing the cortical bone among the groups, the results revealed increasing levels of stress in the order of QI, QII, and QIII. Comparing the medullary bone among the groups, the results revealed increasing levels of stress in the order of QIII, QII, and QI. Conclusion It was concluded that greater stress disparity occurred in the comparison between groups QI and QIII. There was a higher TMiP in QI in the cortical bone, but considering the literature values, it would not pose risks to its physiological limits. The use of a pontic fixed partial prosthesis on two regular implants of type III bone quality may cause unfavorable physiological repercussions for the posterior implant apical medullary bone.


PDF Share
  1. Photoelastic stress patterns produced by implant-retained overdentures. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80(05): 559–564
  2. Treatment planning of implants when 3 mandibular posterior teeth are missing: a 3- dimensional finite element analysis. Implant Dent 2012;21(04): 340–343
  3. Mechanical behavior of dental implants in different positions in the rehabilitation of the anterior maxilla. J Prosthet Dent 2014;111(04):301–309
  4. A positive correlation between occlusal trauma and peri-implant bone loss: literature support. Implant Dent 2005;14(02):108–116
  5. Comparative evaluation of the effect of diameter, length and number of implants supporting three-unit fixed partial prostheses on stress distribution in the bone. J Dent 2002;30(01):41–46
  6. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (II). Etiopathogenesis. Eur J Oral Sci 1998;106(03):721–764
  7. Implant success, survival, and failure: the International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) Pisa Consensus Conference. Implant Dent 2008;17(01):5–15
  8. Survival rates and complication behaviour of tooth implant-supported, fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 2019;88:103167
  9. Group 2 ITI Consensus Report: Prosthodontics and implant dentistry. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018;29(Suppl 16):215–223
  10. Biomechanical analysis of different implant-abutments interfaces in different bone types: An in silico analysis. Mater Sci Eng C 2018;90:645–650
  11. The effect of three different crown heights and two different bone types on implants placed in the posterior maxilla: three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2016;31(02):e1–e10
  12. Finite element analysis on influence of implant surface treatments, connection and bone types. Mater Sci Eng C 2016;63:292–300
  13. Bone density: a key determinant for treatment. Planning In: Misch CE. Contemporary Implant Dentistry. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2007:130–146
  14. Métodos de avaliação da densidade mineral óssea e seu emprego na Odontologia. Pesq Bras Odontoped Clin Integr 2006;6:289–294
  15. Monitoring osteoporosis therapy: bone mineral density, bone turnovermarkers, or both? Am J Med 2006; 119(04, Suppl 1):S25–S31
  16. Application of the finite element method in dental implant research. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2006;9(04):257–270
  17. Bone classification: clinical-histomorphometric comparison. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999;10(01):1–7
  18. Handbook of Biomaterial Properties. London: Chapman & Hall Publ.; 1998:3–23
  19. The Finite Element Method. 6th ed, Vol. 1 Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2005:164–199
  20. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the stress distribution on morse taper implants surface. J Prosthodont Res 2013;57 (03):206–212
  21. Avaliação das tensões e deformações do osso cortical mandibular sob ação do músculo pterigoideo lateral pela análise de elementos finitos. Monografia de Graduação. Piracicaba, Brazil: Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba – UNICAMP; 2013:25
  22. Dissertação de Mestrado, Faculdade de Odontologia da Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais. Belo Horizonte2008:62
  23. Influence of alveolar support on stress in periodontal structures. J Dent Res 2006;85(12):1087–1091
  24. Variations in cortical material properties throughout the human dentate mandible. Am J Phys Anthropol 2003;120(03):252–277
  25. Threedimensional finite element analysis of the effect of different bone quality on stress distribution in an implant-supported crown. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93(03):227–234
  26. Biomechanical repercussions of bone resorption related to biologic width: a finite element analysis of three implant-abutment con-figurations. Int J Periodont Restor Dent 2009;29:479–487
  27. Influence of prosthesis type andmaterial on the stress distribution in bone around implants: a 3- dimensional finite element analysis. J Dent Sci 2011;6:25–32
  28. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress-distribution around single tooth implants as a function of bony support, prosthesis type, and loading during function. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76(06):633–640
  29. Finite element analysis of bone stress in the posterior mandible using regular and short implants, in the same context, with splinted and non-splinted prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2017; 32:199–206
  30. Impact of annual bone loss and different bone quality on dental implant success - A finite element study. Comput Biol Med 2017;91:318–325
  31. Finite element analysis of 2 immediate loading systems in edentulous mandible: rigid and semirigid splinting of implants. Implant Dent 2010;19(01):39–49
  32. A 2003 update of bone physiology and Wolff's Law for clinicians. Angle Orthod 2004;74(01):3–15
  33. Finite element analysis of bone stress around microimplants of different diameters and lengths with application of a single or composite torque force. PLoS One 2015;10:1–9
  34. Magnitude and direction of mechanical stress at the osseointegrated interface of the microthread implant. J Periodontol 2011;82(07):1061–1070
  35. Bone reactions to longstanding functional load at implants: an experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32(09):925–932
  36. Influence of bone quality on the stress distribution. An in vitro experiment. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8(01):18–22
  37. FE study of bone quality effect on load-carrying ability of dental implants. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2014;17(16): 1751–1761
  38. Effects of Mechanical Repetitive Load on Bone Quality Around Implants in RatMaxillae. Yamadaoka, Suita-city, Osaka, Japan: Department of Applied Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan, Division of Materials and Manufacturing Science, Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University; 2017:8
  39. Anisotropic elasticity of cortical and cancellous bone in the posterior mandible increases peri-implant stress and strain under oblique loading. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12(06):648–657
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.