Dental Journal of Advance Studies

Register      Login

VOLUME 7 , ISSUE 2 ( May-August, 2019 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Evaluation of Smile Parameters in Nongrowing Subjects Using Photographs

Mandeep Bhullar, Yagyeshwar Malhotra, Sanjay Mittal, Isha Aggarwal, Divya Singla, Merry Goyal

Keywords : smile parameters, esthetics, buccal corridor

Citation Information : Bhullar M, Malhotra Y, Mittal S, Aggarwal I, Singla D, Goyal M. Evaluation of Smile Parameters in Nongrowing Subjects Using Photographs. 2019; 7 (2):87-94.

DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1698360

License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Published Online: 18-10-2019

Copyright Statement:  © 2019 Bhojia Dental College and Hospital affiliated to Himachal Pradesh University


Abstract

Introduction An attractive or pleasing smile enhances the acceptance of an individual in the society by improving interpersonal relationships. In this new era of social media, people are more concerned about their smile; hence, smile esthetics has become the primary objective of orthodontic treatment. It is seen that various smile parameters change with age and gender. Aim The aim of the study was to evaluate various smile parameters in nongrowing patients using photographic analysis. Materials and Methods The sample comprised photographs of 50 subjects (8 males, 42 females) taken in natural head position and then divided into two age groups: Group I (25 subjects, aged 18–20 years) and Group II (25 subjects, aged 23–29 years). The various parameters were analyzed using Adobe Photoshop software (version CS 6; Adobe System Inc., California, United States): upper lip and lower lip lengths during rest and smiling, smile index, buccal corridor, upper and lower lip thickness, interlabial gap, incisal display, widest visible maxillary display, and intercommissural width. Results The results showed that lower lip length at rest and smiling, interlabial gap, incisal display, inner commissure width, and widest visible maxillary display were increased, whereas upper lip length both at rest and smiling, upper and lower lip thickness, outer commissure width, smile index, and buccal corridor were decreased with age. Statistically significant sex-related differences were found in upper lip length at rest and lower lip length both at rest and smiling. Conclusion Orthodontic treatment must incorporate various esthetic elements of smile to achieve desirable results.


PDF Share
  1. Webster's third new international dictionary of the English language (Vol. II). 14th ed. Springfield, United States: G & C Merriam Company; 2151
  2. An esthetic evaluation of lip–teeth relationships present in the smile. Am J Orthod 1970;57(2):132–144
  3. Some esthetic factors in a smile. J Prosthet Dent 1984;51(1):24–28
  4. Smile esthetics from the layperson's perspective. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;139:e91–e101
  5. Dental smile esthetics: the assessment and creation of the ideal smile. Semin Orthod 2012;18:193–201
  6. Smile analysis and design in the digital era. J Clin Orthod 2002;36(4):221–236
  7. Smile analysis in orthodontics. Indian J Oral Sci 2014;5:49–54
  8. A balanced smile—a most important treatment objective. Am J Orthod 1977;72(4):359–372
  9. A morphometric analysis of the posed smile. Clin Orthod Res 1998;1(1):2–11
  10. 4th edition. St. Louis, MO: Mosby Year Book; 2005:46–47
  11. The dynesthetic interpretation of the dentogenic concept. J Prosthet Dent 1958;8:558–581
  12. Cephalometric soft tissue analysis of individuals with pleasant faces. Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society 2007;41(4):148-161
  13. Age-related changes of the dental aesthetic zone at rest and during spontaneous smiling and speech. Eur J Orthod 2008;30(4):366–373
  14. Characterization of posed smile by using visual analog scale, smile arc, buccal corridor measures, and modified smile index. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133(4):515–523
  15. Dynamic smile analysis: changes with age. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:310. el–e10
  16. Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Part I. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;103(4):299–312
  17. Anthropometric proportions in the upper lip-lower lip-chin area of the lower face in young white adults. Am J Orthod 1984;86(1):52–60
  18. Discussion: lip-nasal aesthetics following LeFort osteotomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1988;81:180–182
  19. Cephalometric analysis of dentofacial normals. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1980;78(4):404-420
  20. Subjective vs objective evaluations of smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;1354) (suppl):S72–S79
  21. Dynamics of a smile in different age groups. Angle Orthod 2013;83(1):90–96
  22. Soft-tissue cephalometric norms in a South Indian ethnic population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133(6):876–881
  23. Esthetic and smile characteristics at rest and during smiling. J Indian Orthod Soc 2012;46(1):17–25
  24. Changes in frontal soft tissue dimensions of the lower face by age and gender. World J Orthod 2002;3:313–320
  25. Dynamic smile visualization and quantification: part 2. Smile analysis and treatment strategies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124(2):116–127
  26. The impact of buccal corridors on smile attractiveness. Eur J Orthod 2007;29(5):530–537
  27. Dynamic smile visualization and quantification: part 1. Evolution of the concept and dynamic records for smile capture. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124(1):4–12
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.