Dental Journal of Advance Studies

Register      Login

VOLUME 7 , ISSUE 3 ( September-December, 2019 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Arch Length and Palatal Rugae: An Adjunct in Gender Discrimination

Sanjay Mittal, Pooja Vyas, Mandeep Bhullar, Divya Singla, Isha Aggarwal, Rameez Hassan

Keywords : arch length, gender discrimination, palatal rugae

Citation Information : Mittal S, Vyas P, Bhullar M, Singla D, Aggarwal I, Hassan R. Arch Length and Palatal Rugae: An Adjunct in Gender Discrimination. 2019; 7 (3):110-113.

DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1701145

License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Published Online: 23-01-2020

Copyright Statement:  © 2019 Bhojia Dental College and Hospital affiliated to Himachal Pradesh University


Abstract

Introduction Palatal rugae or plica palatine are the finger prints of the oral cavity and the arch length varies between males and females. These two parameters constitute an integral part of the anthropometric studies in the realms of dentistry as well as forensic odontology. The aim of this study was to assess whether any relationship existed between the upper arch length and the rugae pattern and whether these two parameters showed any gender differentiation. Materials and Methods The sample consisted of upper and lower study models of 60 subjects (30 males and 30 females). Arch lengths were measured using a brass wire and rugae were traced on the dental casts and assessed by applying the Thomas and Kotze classification (1983). The data collected was subjected to statistical analysis. Results The results showed that the maxillary and mandibular arch length dimensions were higher in males than in females; however, the differences were found to be statistically insignificant. The assessment of rugae pattern showed that the male subjects had a higher number of rugae. The differences in rugae pattern distribution for male and female subjects were found to be statistically significant. Conclusion The palatal rugae pattern and maxillary arch length can be used as an additional method in differentiating gender between human population groups.


PDF Share
  1. Palatal rugoscopy: establishing identity. J Forensic Dent Sci 2010;2(1):27–31
  2. Identification of individuals using palatal rugae: computerized method. J Forensic Dent Sci 2010;2(2):86–90
  3. Experimental studies of forensic odontology to aid in the identification process. J Forensic Dent Sci 2010;2(2):69–76
  4. Morphological pattern of palatal rugae in children of Davangere. J Forensic Sci 2011;56(5):1192–1197
  5. The palatal ruga pattern in six southern African human populations, part I: a description of the populations and a method for its investigation. J Dent Assoc S Afr 1983;38(9):547–553
  6. Dental arch length and arch symmetry analysis of Nepalese permanent dentition. J Nepal Dent Assoc 2009;10:110–114
  7. Size of dental arches in a tribe of Central Australian aborigines. J Dent Res 1965;44(5):912–920
  8. Changes in the dental arches and dentition between 25 and 45 years of age. Angle Orthod 1996;66(6):417–422
  9. [A dental anthropological study of Chinese in Taiwan (2). Teeth size, dental arch dimensions and forms]. Gaoxiong Yi Xue Ke Xue Za Zhi 1991;7(12):635–643
  10. An anthropometric analysis of facial height, arch length, and palatal rugae in the Indian and Nepalese population. J Forensic Dent Sci 2011;3(1):33–37
  11. Morphological study of palatal rugae in a Sudanese population. Int J Dent 2015;2015(1):650648
  12. Prevalence of different palatal rugae patterns in a sample Lucknow population. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol 2014;26(4):406–409
  13. Palatal rugae patterns in Australian aborigines and Caucasians. Aust Dent J 1997;42(2):129–133
  14. Sathish Kumar G, Shanti V. Palatoscopy among Pondicherry population. J Sci Dent 2011;1(2):16–18
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.