Evaluation of Different Light-Curing Units—Light-Emitting Diodes and Quartz–Tungsten–Halogen-Based Light-Curing Units in Polymerization of Posterior Composite: An In Vitro Study
Rajinder Bansal, M. Bansal, S. Walia, C. Gupta, L. Bansal, R. Aggarwal
Citation Information :
Bansal R, Bansal M, Walia S, Gupta C, Bansal L, Aggarwal R. Evaluation of Different Light-Curing Units—Light-Emitting Diodes and Quartz–Tungsten–Halogen-Based Light-Curing Units in Polymerization of Posterior Composite: An In Vitro Study. 2018; 6 (2--3):60-64.
Objective To assess the adequacy of various light-curing units to polymerize the posterior composite resin.
Materials and Methods Specimens were prepared by placing a single increment of posterior composite resin in split cylindrical metallic mold of dimension (6.0 mm in diameter and 5 mm in depth). Polymerization was done by utilizing one quartz-tungsten-halogen and three light-emitting diode light-curing units of different powers. The specimens of composite resin were then mounted on metallic molds utilizing autopolymerizing acrylic resin. After polishing, the complete setting of composite resin material was analyzed using Vickers hardness test.
Results Showed in each group, hardness reduced as we moved from upper to lower surface of composite resin. Furthermore, hardness increased as intensity of light was increased. The maximum hardness was detected when light-emitting diode light-curing unit having intensity of 1,250 mW/cm2 was utilized and least hardness was detected when halogen lamp having intensity 418 mW/cm2 was utilized and results were found to be highly significant (p < 0.01).
Conclusion It was concluded that increased top and bottom hardness can be accomplished by utilizing the light-curing unit of high intensity.
Hardness evaluation of a dental composite polymerized with experimental LED-based devices. Dent Mater 2001;17(4):309–315
Effect of the increase of energy density on Knoop hardness of dental composites light-cured by conventional QTH, LED and xenon plasma arc. Braz Dent J 2005;16(3):218–224
Light curing of resin-based composites in the LED era. Am J Dent 2008;21(3):135–142
The depth of polymerization of visible-light cured composite resin. Quintessence Int 1985;10:693–701
Correlation of parameters used to estimate monomer conversion in a light-cured composite. J Dent Res 1988;67(6):932-937
Available from http://docplayer.fr/53563572-Surefilhigh-density-posterior-restorative-directions-for-use-english.html; accessed on October 8, 2018
Factors affecting cure of visible light activated composites. Int Dent J 1985;35(3):218–225
Composite resin microhardness: the influence of light curing method, composite shade, and depth of cure. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008;9(4):43–50
Influence of curing tip distance on composite Knoop hardness values. Braz Dent J 2000;11(1):11–17
Curing-light intensity and depth of cure of resin-based composites tested according to international standards. J Am Dent Assoc 2002;133(4):429–434, quiz 491–493
A survey of output intensity and potential for depth of cure among light-curing units in clinical use. J Dent 1999;27(3):235–241
Effects of polymerization techniques on uniformity of cure of large-diameter, photo- initiated composite resin restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1986;113(6):905–909
Care and maintenance of dental curing lights. Dent Today 1991;10(1):40–41
Clinical guidelines for photocuring restorative resins. J Am Dent Assoc 1995;126(9):1280–1282, 1284, 1286
Jandt KD. Optical power outputs, spectra and dental composite depths of cure, obtained with blue light emitting diode (LED) and halogen light curing units (LCUs). Br Dent J 2002;193(8):459-463