Dental Journal of Advance Studies

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Volume  12 (2024)
Volume  11 (2023)
Volume  10 (2022)
Volume  9 (2021)
Volume  8 (2020)
Volume  7 (2019)
Volume  6 (2018)
Volume  5 (2017)
Volume  4 (2016)
Volume  3 (2015)
Volume  2 (2014)
Volume  1 (2013)
Related articles

VOLUME 6 , ISSUE 2--3 ( September-December, 2018 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Comparison of Canal Transportation and Centric Ability of Two Nickel-Titanium Rotary Systems Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography: An In Vitro Study

Aditi Soni, Anjali Oak

Keywords : canal transportation, centering ability, cone beam computed tomography

Citation Information : Soni A, Oak A. Comparison of Canal Transportation and Centric Ability of Two Nickel-Titanium Rotary Systems Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography: An In Vitro Study. 2018; 6 (2--3):76-79.

DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1677627

License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Published Online: 10-01-2019

Copyright Statement:  © 2018 Bhojia Dental College and Hospital affiliated to Himachal Pardesh University


Abstract

Aim The aim of this study was to compare the canal transportation and canal centric ability of One Shape (Micro Mega, Besançon, France) and Mani Silk (Mani Utsunomiya, Tochigi, Japan) nickel-titanium (NiTi) rotary files in curved canals with the help of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and Methods Total 40 mesiobuccal canals of maxillary molars with an angle of curvature ranging between 25 and 45 degrees were divided according to the instrument used in canal preparation into two groups 20 samples each: One Shape (group 1) and Mani Silk (group 2). Pre- and post-instrumentation scans were performed using CBCT (Carestream CS 9300 scanner) to evaluate the transportation and centric ability at apical, middle, and coronal levels using unpaired Student's t-test. Results Mani Silk file showed significantly less canal transportation and better canal centric ability compared to One Shape system. Conclusion Mani Silk file maintained original canal curvature better than One Shape NiTi rotary file.

PDF Share
  1. Bacterial removal promoted by 2 single-file systems: Wave One and One Shape. J Endod 2014;40(12):1995–1998
  2. Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin North Am 1974;18(2):269–296
  3. Do procedural errors cause endodontic treatment failure? J Am Dent Assoc 2005;136(2): 187–193, quiz 231
  4. Comparison of nickel-titanium and stainless steel hand-file instrumentation using computed tomography. J Endod 1996;22(7):369–375
  5. An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files. J Endod 1988;14(7):346–351
  6. Use of cone beam computed tomography in endodontics. Int J Dent 2009;2009:634567
  7. The root canal shaping ability of Wave One and Reciproc versus ProTaper Universal and Mtwo rotary NiTi systems. Saudi Endod J 2017;7:8–15
  8. Shaping ability of different single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. Int Endod J 2013;46(6):590–597
  9. A comparison of two NiTi rotary systems, ProTaper Next and Silk for root canal cleaning ability—an in vitro study. Ind J Conserv Endod 2016;1(1):22–24
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.